Nepal in Turmoil: Gen-Z Protests Over a Social-Media Ban, Corruption and the Resignation of the Prime Minister
On 9–10 September 2025, Nepal was rocked by a wave of youth-led protests that quickly escalated into the country’s most violent political unrest in years. What began as outrage over a sudden government ban and proposed regulation of popular social-media platforms turned into a much broader eruption of anger at perceived corruption, nepotism and economic stagnation — and it culminated in the resignation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli and the torching of government buildings, including parts of the parliament complex.
What Triggered the Uprising
The immediate spark was a government move to block and tightly regulate widely used apps and platforms — an action many Nepalis saw as censorship and an attempt to muzzle online dissent. Young people, who use social media to organise, document abuses and air grievances, reacted fast. Within days, teenagers and twenty-somethings who call themselves Nepal’s Gen-Z took to the streets in cities and towns across the country. The protests were decentralised and often organised on alternative messaging apps and short-video platforms after the ban, showing how resilient online organising has become.
But the ban was only the match; the tinder had been laid long before. Demonstrators pointed to endemic corruption, a pattern of elite privilege (terms such as “nepo kids” — a shorthand for the public perception that politicians’ children live in luxury while most young people struggle — surfaced repeatedly on social feeds) and a lack of economic opportunity that pushes thousands of Nepalis abroad for work. Many protesters framed their anger as generational: an angry young population demanding accountability and real change rather than symbolic resignations.
The Violence, the Death Toll, and the Resignation
As crowds surged toward official buildings, clashes with police grew fierce. Security forces used tear gas, rubber bullets, and, according to multiple reports, live rounds; hospitals and local officials reported dozens of casualties. Official counts have varied between sources: police and some outlets reported at least 19 people killed in the worst clashes, while other reports raised the toll higher as unrest spread and more injuries were confirmed. Hundreds were injured, and there was widespread property damage as protesters set fire to government offices and the residence of some senior politicians. The political fallout was immediate — under intense pressure and amid chaos, Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli submitted his resignation.
Escalation: Parliament Torched, Army on the Streets
The anger spilled into symbolic acts: parts of the Singha Durbar (the seat of the government) and offices linked to leading parties were stormed and set alight. Videos and eyewitness reports showed protesters entering government compounds and standing atop burned-out buildings — powerful images that underscored the depth of public fury. With law and order deteriorating in parts of Kathmandu, the army was deployed in efforts to restore order and evacuate vulnerable ministers; curfews and emergency measures followed. Observers warned that even with Oli’s resignation, the situation could remain volatile because demonstrators demand systemic reforms, not just one leader’s departure.
Also read: Erin Patterson Sentenced to Life Imprisonment With 33-Year Non-Parole Period
Why the Protests Go Beyond the Ban
Several structural grievances explain why a single policy could ignite such a broad revolt. First, youth unemployment and underemployment have left large segments of young Nepalis frustrated with slow economic mobility. Second, decades of political instability and repeated scandals have eroded trust in institutions; many young people see the political class as self-serving and out of touch. Third, social media itself changed expectations: platforms let citizens expose corruption, organise quickly and set narratives independent of traditional media — so when the state appeared to threaten that space, many saw it as an attack on transparency itself. These elements combined to make the demonstrations about much more than apps.
What Protesters are Demanding
Beyond the immediate demand to lift the ban and hold those responsible for the violence to account, protesters are calling for broader political reforms: investigations into corruption, limits on elite impunity, concrete plans to create jobs and opportunities for young people, and guarantees that freedom of expression — online and offline — will be protected. Many activists have also insisted that any successor government should be more representative and take concrete anti-corruption steps rather than recycling the same political faces.
Regional and International Reactions
International observers and neighbouring countries have been watching anxiously. Diplomatic statements called for calm and restraint, while human-rights groups urged impartial investigations into the deaths and injuries. Analysts noted the resemblance of Nepal’s unrest to recent youth-led movements in the region: a mix of online mobilization and physical protest, with social media serving as both the amplifier of grievances and the battlefield when states attempt to control it.
What Comes Next
The immediate questions are procedural — who will lead a caretaker government, can a credible inquiry into the violence be launched, and will the political class accept demands for genuine reform? But the broader story is likely to be longer and more consequential: a politically awakened generation that has tasted collective action and footage of state repression in real time may not easily be placated by ritual resignations. If Nepal’s leaders fail to respond with transparency, accountability and a real plan for economic inclusion, the unrest could re-ignite or morph into sustained pressure for structural change.
Conclusion
Nepal’s crisis in early September 2025 is a concentrated expression of long-running frustrations — economic stagnation, perceived corruption, and a youth cohort that refuses to be spoken for. A social-media ban lit the fuse, but the anger that poured into the streets was older and broader. The resignation of the prime minister is a dramatic moment, but it may only be the beginning of a longer political reckoning over who governs Nepal and how. The coming weeks will test whether Nepal’s institutions can deliver the accountability and reforms protesters demand — or whether the country will face deeper instability as a result.
